抑郁症的中医五行音乐疗法研究:一项文献计量学分析

The study of traditional Chinese medicine five-element music therapy for depression: a bibliometric analysis

  • 摘要:
    目的 通过文献计量学方法系统分析五行音乐疗法在抑郁症干预中的研究现状、亮点及发展趋势。
    方法 检索中国知网、万方数据、维普和Web of Science数据库2000年1月1日至2025年8月6日期间,关于五行音乐疗法干预抑郁症的相关文献。使用Excel、VOSviewer和CiteSpace等工具进行文献计量分析,重点关注发文趋势、期刊分布、机构与作者合作、关键词共现、聚类分析、突现检测和高被引文献等维度。
    结果 共纳入382篇文献,包括304篇中文文献和78篇英文文献。该领域的年度发文量呈稳步上升趋势,中文研究起步较早并占主导地位,而英文研究自2019年起出现显著增长。机构和作者合作网络分析显示,研究团队主要集中在南京中医药大学的林发才教授和山东中医药大学附属医院的李丽教授团队,中文作者和机构仍为英文文献的主要贡献者。关键词分析表明,中文研究侧重于抑郁症五行音乐、五音疗法、针灸等临床应用,而英文研究则侧重于音乐疗法、抑郁症、随机对照试验、焦虑等,更多关注机制和标准化问题。聚类分析揭示了从传统中医理论解释向融合神经生物学机制与现代技术的研究范式转变。高被引文献的分析进一步印证了这一趋势,表明五行音乐疗法研究正在从经验性的临床探索转向循证的机制研究。
    结论 五行音乐疗法在抑郁症干预中的研究呈现出不同的研究侧重点,中文文献研究主要聚焦于中医理论和临床应用,而英文文献研究则更注重循证机制。未来的研究应整合系统评价和高质量的临床试验,增强跨机构合作,进一步丰富机制证据,并扩大五行音乐疗法的应用范围。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To systematically analyze the research status, highlights, and advancements of five-element music therapy (FEMT) in intervening depression with bibliometric methods.
    Methods Relevant research literature on FEMT for depression intervention was retrieved from China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data, Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), and Web of Science (WOS), spanning from January 1, 2000 to August 6, 2025. Bibliometric analysis was performed using Excel, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace, with a focus on dimensions like publication trends, journal distribution, institutional and author collaboration, keyword co-occurrence, clustering, and burst detection, and highly cited publications.
    Results A total of 382 articles were included, comprising 304 Chinese articles and 78 English articles. Annual publication volume in this field exhibited a steady upward trend, with Chinese literature initiating earlier and maintaining dominance, while English literature demonstrated marked growth from 2019 onward. Network analysis of institutional and author collaborations revealed collaborative networks centered on research teams led by Facai LIN (Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine) and Li LI (Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine), with Chinese authors and institutions remaining dominant contributors to English literature. Keyword analysis indicated that Chinese literature emphasizes clinical applications such as “depression” “five-elements music” “five-tone therapy” and “acupuncture”, whereas English literature prioritize “music therapy” “depression” “randomized controlled trial” and “anxiety” with a focus on mechanisms and standardization. Cluster analysis revealed a paradigm shift from traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) theoretical explanations to research integrating neurobiological mechanisms and modern technologies. Analysis of highly cited literature further corroborated this trend, indicating that FEMT research is transitioning from empirical clinical exploration to evidence-based mechanistic inquiry.
    Conclusion FEMT research on depression shows distinct thematic emphase, with Chinese literature focusing on TCM theory and clinical applications, while English literature emphasize evidence-based mechanisms. Future research should integrate systematic reviews and high-quality clinical trials and strengthen cross-institutional collaboration to enhance mechanistic evidence and broaden the scope of FEMT.

     

/

返回文章
返回